Legal Opinion
The Pillsbury Company v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 7, 1966No. 18825PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, Chief Judge.
This is a petition by the Pillsbury Company to review and set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission requiring Pillsbury to divest itself of the assets of Ballard & Ballard Company and of Duff’s Baking Mix Division of American Home Products Corporation which the Federal Trade Commission found it had acquired in violation of § 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, and further requiring Pillsbury to restore the acquired companies to the status of “effective competitors.” Alternatively, Pillsbury seeks leave to adduce additional evidence pursuant to § 11(c) of the Clayton…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Sierra Club v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, National Coal Association, Alabama Power Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- The Second National Natural Gas Rate Cases American Public Gas Association v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Federal Election Commission v. Nra Political Victory FundCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Teresita Ching v. Alejandro MayorkasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.