Legal Opinion

Teresita Ching v. Alejandro Mayorkas

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 7, 2013No. 11-17041PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

Teresita Ching and her husband, Brooke Joseph, claim that their procedural due process rights and their rights under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) were violated during the adjudication of Joseph’s 1-130 visa petition for an immediate relative. Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that their rights under the APA were not violated, but their procedural due process rights were. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I

Teresita Ching, a native of China and citizen of the Philippines, lawfully entered the United States on November 5, 2004 as a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. P. SINGHBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2019
  2. J.E.F.M. v. HolderDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
  3. Gary Kirk v. Commissioner of SSACourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  4. Latif v. HolderDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
  5. Doe v. TrumpDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2017

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API