Legal Opinion

In Re Hicks

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided September 29, 1987No. 19-70194PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

L. CHANDLER WATSON, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

This is a chapter 13 bankruptcy case commenced March 10, 1986. The required hearing on confirmation of the debtors’ plan 1 was held July 22, 1986, but was inconclusive because of an uncertainty as to how a claim for an arrearage of $1,003.79 on a home-mortgage debt was to be paid. An amendment to the plan was filed September 22,1986, providing that the claim be paid through the trustee, but the problem was not resolved for there was then an insufficiency of funds to be paid to the trustee to accommodate all requirements of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. In Re John Houtman and Gladys Irene Houtman, Bankrupts. John Houtman and Gladys Irene Houtman v. Edgar F. Mann and Edna M. Mann, Creditors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. Alaimo v. RoyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Morimura, Arai & Co. v. TabackSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Heinold Commodities & Securities, Inc. v. Hunt (In Re Hunt)District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re William FESQ, Debtor. BRANCHBURG PLAZA ASSOCIATES, L.P., Appellant, v. William FESQCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. Jones v. United States, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (In Re Jones)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  3. In Re BulsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2005
  4. In Re PuckettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  5. In Re SzostekUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API