Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Szostek

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1988No. 14-10702PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUCE I. FOX, Bankruptcy Judge:

I have before me two motions, the first brought by the debtors, Fred and Denise Szostek, for an award of attorneys’ fees and the second brought by a creditor, The Kissell Company, which seeks to have the debtors' confirmed chapter 13 plan either dismissed, revoked or modified. 1

I

The debtors filed their bankruptcy petition on July 7, 1987. On August 3, 1987, notice was issued scheduling the meeting of creditors and a hearing on confirmation of the plan. The notice stated that the confirmation hearing would be held on December 15, 1987 and that objections…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Rodriguez v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  5. REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph SHOAF, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Fred J. Szostek, Denise M. SzostekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. In Re Command Services Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1989
  3. Vitelli v. Cheltenham Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re Vitelli)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. In Re SicilianoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Tenn-Fla Partners v. First Union National Bank of FloridaDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API