Legal Opinion
Heinold Commodities & Securities, Inc. v. Hunt (In Re Hunt)
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided May 9, 1983No. Bankruptcy No. 381-04076, Adv. Nos. 382-0133, 382-0134PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REPORT OF STANDING MASTER 1
KEITH M. LUNDIN, Bankruptcy Judge, Standing Master.
At issue in this case is the dischargeability of losses incurred by the debtor through trading commodity futures in United States Treasury Bonds. The plaintiffs assert that the debtor’s losses are nondischargeable because fraudulently procured by the issuing of bad checks and the making of a false financial statement. For the reasons discussed below, the standing master concludes that the debts to plaintiffs are dischargea-ble.
I. FACTS
The plaintiffs, E.F. Hutton & Company, Inc. (“Hutton”) and Heinold Commodities &…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Tinker v. ColwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Gleason v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- In Re Ira Laurence Hunter, Debtor. Edwin Schweig v. Ira Laurence HunterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Palmacci v. UmpierrezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- In the Matter of Michael VAN HORNE. Margaret CASPERS, Appellee, v. Michael VAN HORNE, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- In the Matter of Richard C. Scarlata, Debtor. Goldberg Securities, Inc. v. Richard C. Scarlata, Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- In the Matter of Robert Oneal Bogstad, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.