Hardy v. . Fryer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBbogden, J.
Tbe question is this: Under what conditions will reference in a registered instrument, to a prior encumbrance unregistered, constitute a valid and enforceable lien by tbe bolder of such prior unregistered encumbrance ?
Tbe principles deducible from our decisions upon tbe subject of tbe sufficiency of tbe references necessary to impart vitality to a prior unregistered encumbrance, may be stated as follows:
1. Tbe creditor bolding, tbe prior unregistered encumbrance must be named and identified witb certainty.
2. Tbe property must be conveyed “subject to” or in subordination to sucb prior…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blacknall v. . HancockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Hinton v. . LeighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- North State Piano Co. v. SpruillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Avery County Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Hardy v. . AbdallahSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bourne v. LAY & COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State Trust Co. v. BraznellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Smith v. . Turnage-Winslow Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Colwell Electric Co. v. Kale-Barnwell Realty & Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Story v. . SladeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.