Legal Opinion

Bourne v. LAY & COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1965No. 34PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, C.J.

This appeal poses two questions: (1) Is the plaintiffs’ subsequently acquired but prior recorded deed superior to the defendant’s lease? (2) Are the plaintiffs estopped from denying the validity of defendant’s lease by accepting rent in accordance with its terms for a period of two years and one month?

In our opinion, the first question must be answered in the affirmative and the second in the negative.

The Connor Act provides that “no conveyance of land, or contract to convey, or lease of land for more than three years shall be valid to pass any property, as against creditors or purchasers for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Combes v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Blacknall v. . HancockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. North State Piano Co. v. SpruillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Hayes v. RicardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Godley v. County of PittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State Highway Commission v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Hill v. Pinelawn Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. New Bar Partnership v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. Simmons v. Quick-Stop Food Mart, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API