Legal Opinion

Avery County Bank v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1923PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQlaRKSON, J.

The fourth exception by interveners, the appellants, is as follows: “The interveners, A. S. Abernathy & Son, in due time requested the following special instructions to the jury: 'If you shall find from the evidence that the property taken from the plaintiffs by interveners was properly covered by defendant’s mortgage to ' inter-veners, dated 7 December, 1920, and that the mortgage given plaintiffs by defendant, dated 23 December, 1920, was made subject to the .prior mortgage given interveners by the defendant, then you shall find that the interveners are the owners and entitled to possession…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blacknall v. . HancockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Hinton v. . LeighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. North State Piano Co. v. SpruillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. Tremaine v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Builders Sash & Door Co. v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bourne v. LAY & COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Whitehurst v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. State Trust Co. v. BraznellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Story v. . SladeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Whitehurst v. . GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API