Legal Opinion

State Trust Co. v. Braznell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1947PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The court below made no ruling in respect to the reservation contained in the deeds from Hodges and Crowell, executor, 'to Long and wife. Hence the question of its sufficiency to protect the leasehold rights of plaintiff is not presented for decision.

The defendant concedes that plaintiff “stands in the shoes or sits in the seat” of the Longs under whom it claims, and it may maintain this action to reform the deed to make it express the true contract in respect to its leasehold interest. Sills v. Ford, 171 N. C., 733, 88 S. E., 636; Bank v. Redwine, 171 N. C., 559, 88 S. E., 878; Machinery Co.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Turner v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Sills v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. King v. Hobbs.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. McClure v. . CrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. State v. . RaperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. GrannisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  2. Yount v. LoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Bourne v. LAY & COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Durham v. CreechCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Roberts v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API