Legal Opinion

First Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Bank of America

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1970No. Civ. 25969PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAYLOR, J.

Bank of America (hereafter Bank) appeals from an adverse judgment allowing First Savings and Loan Association (hereafter First) restitution for its mistake in honoring a writ of execution against its depositors, Albert E. and Robin E. Bell (hereafter collectively referred to as Bell). The Bank contends that restitution was not the proper remedy as First’s mistake was one of law, and the satisfaction of the Bank’s prior judgment against Bell constituted a change of position. We cannot agree.

The facts are not in dispute. On July 26,1966, the Bank obtained a judgment for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Bank of California v. MinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Texas Company v. ToddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Dunham v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. Western Etc. Oil Co. v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. American Oil Service, Inc. v. Hope Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bridges v. Cal-Pacific Leasing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. American Psychometric Consultants, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Willis v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API