Legal Opinion

Batson v. Batson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 10, 1928No. 7 Div. 770PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The contest in chancery is of the probate of a will. The facts were submitted to a jury duly demanded. Code, §§ 10617, 10640; Wachter v. Davis, 215 Ala. 659, 111 So. 917; Ala. T. & N. Ry. Co. v. Aliceville Lumber Co., 199 Ala. 391, 402, 74 So. 441.

The grounds of contest were sufficient, and duly presented the issue of fact of decedent’s mental capacity — that testator was of unsound mind at the time of the execution of the will. Wear v. Wear, 200 Ala. 345, 76 So. 111; Barksdale v. Davis, 114 Ala. 623, 627, 22 So. 17. The issue of undue influence was eliminated by instruction of the court.

There…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Burney v. TorreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Taylor v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  4. Wear v. WearSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Miller v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Roan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. City of Dothan v. HardySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Pollard v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Tucker v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API