Batson v. Batson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The contest in chancery is of the probate of a will. The facts were submitted to a jury duly demanded. Code, §§ 10617, 10640; Wachter v. Davis, 215 Ala. 659, 111 So. 917; Ala. T. & N. Ry. Co. v. Aliceville Lumber Co., 199 Ala. 391, 402, 74 So. 441.
The grounds of contest were sufficient, and duly presented the issue of fact of decedent’s mental capacity — that testator was of unsound mind at the time of the execution of the will. Wear v. Wear, 200 Ala. 345, 76 So. 111; Barksdale v. Davis, 114 Ala. 623, 627, 22 So. 17. The issue of undue influence was eliminated by instruction of the court.
There…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Burney v. TorreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Taylor v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
- Wear v. WearSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Miller v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Roan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- City of Dothan v. HardySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Pollard v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Tucker v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.