Legal Opinion

Jones v. Keith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 14, 1931No. 6 Div. 620PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit was for damages for personal injury ; went to the jury on count 1, and judgment was for the defendant. The defendant pleaded the general issue, in short by consent. Demurrer was sustained to the wanton count No. 2. There was motion for a new trial that was overruled.

The difference between simple negligence and wantonness as a proximate cause of injury is well understood. If there was evidence to sustain a count based on the latter theory, a verdict and judgment for defendant on the simple negligence count did not correct error, if such there was, in sustaining demurrers to a…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Montgomery Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. Gassenheimer v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  3. Ga. Pacific Railway Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Memphis & Charleston Railroad v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  5. Birmingham Ry. Light & Power Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Gentry v. Swann Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. W. S. Fowler Rental Equipment Company v. SkipperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Bennett v. BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Birmingham Electric Co. v. MannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API