Legal Opinion
Aiken v. McMillan
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 15, 1925No. 1 Div. 287PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
Several phases of this case or controversies growing out of the land and timber therefrom, are discussed in McMillan v. Aiken, 182 Ala. 303, 62 So. 519; Id., 189 Ala. 330, 66 So. 624; Id., 201 Ala. 280, 78 So. 56; Id., 205 Ala. 35, 88 So. 135.
In this suit damages are claimed for trespass to land described specifically as the Francis Girard tract which lies south of Bayou Jessamine, fór the wrongful taking of timber, and for the conversion of timber alleged to have been taken therefrom.
This controversy involves the rights of the respective parties as to the timber in and upon section 44,…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Chambers v. RingstaffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. CrosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Lowery v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Dallas County v. Commercial Union Assurance Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Copeland v. WarrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Tensaw Land & Timber Co. v. RiversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- William E. Harden, Inc. v. HardenAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
- Montgomery v. SpearsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.