South v. . Sisk
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOK, J.
The only assignment of error in this appeal is based on plaintiff’s exception to the judgment. There is no contention that the evidence at the trial in the Superior Court was not sufficient to sustain the findings of fact made by the judge and set out in the record. The judgment is supported by these facts, and for that reason must be affirmed.
It is well settled as the law in this State and elsewhere that, in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, the delivery of a check by a debtor to his creditor, and the acceptance of the check by the creditor, whether the check is drawn by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hayworth v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. BarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Graham v. Proctorville WarehouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Dewey Bros. v. MargolisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
3Cited by5 opinions
- Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Wilson v. Commercial Finance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Thomas v. Prudential Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- Parker v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948