Legal Opinion

Hazen v. Hazen

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 10, 1982No. 81-369PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBors, J.

The defendant, William Hazen, appeals from a decree of divorce and property division which the Superior Court (Johnson, J.) entered in accordance with a Master’s (William E. Lovejoy, Esq.) recommendation. We affirm. Because the plaintiff, Hazel Hazen, died while this appeal was pending, we hold that the provisions in the decree for alimony have become a nullity, but that the parties’ divorce and the provisions for permanent property division should take effect. We enter a judgment nunc pro tunc accordingly. See Blaisdell v. Harris, 52 N.H. 191, 191-92 (1872); see also Walker v. Walker, 108…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bell v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Leclerc v. LeclercSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  3. Heinze v. HeinzeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. Stebbins v. StebbinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  5. Stritch v. StritchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lawlor v. LawlorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. In Re PeiranoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. Angelli v. SherwaySupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  4. Dupuis v. ClickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  5. In the Matter of Lynn Mortner and Theodore MortnerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API