Legal Opinion

Dupuis v. Click

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 13, 1992No. 91-173PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The plaintiff, Gloria Dupuis, appeals from a ruling of the Superior Court (Manias, J.) that the alimony and college education payment obligations of Maurille Dupuis did not survive his death, and, therefore, were not binding and enforceable against his estate. We affirm.

The couple was divorced in 1979, with Mrs. Dupuis being awarded custody of their three minor children, Peter, Marilyn and Maurille, Jr. Her proposed decree, which was not objected to by Maurille, was accepted by the Master (Robert A. Carignan, Esq.), and approved by the Superior Court (Cann, J.). The decree contained, inter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henry v. HenrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  2. Stebbins v. StebbinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  3. Stritch v. StritchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
  4. Gnirk v. GnirkSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  5. Hazen v. HazenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hirst ex rel. Lunt v. DuganSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  2. Holliday v. HollidaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  3. Benson Ex Rel. Patterson v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Chandler v. BishopSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  5. Norberg v. NorbergSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API