Legal Opinion

State v. Parmar

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 2002No. S-00-1327PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.

LeRoy J. Parmar appeals from an order of the district court for Douglas County denying his motion for postconviction relief. For reasons different from those articulated by the district court, we affirm its judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This is Parmar’s fourth request for postconviction relief since his conviction was affirmed by this court on direct appeal. State v. Parmar, 231 Neb. 687, 437 N.W.2d 503 (1989) (Parmar I). Two of the three previous postconviction proceedings were subjects of appeals decided by this court: State v. Parmar, 249 Neb. 462, 544 N.W.2d 102 (1996) (Parmar II),…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. HessNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. TrotterNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. CaddyNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. LindsayNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. RyanNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. SimsNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Hall v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. Al-ZubaidyNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Egan v. StolerNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Fisher v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API