Legal Opinion

State v. Lindsay

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1994No. S-92-1049PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.

Claiming he received ineffective assistance of counsel at his trial for unlawful possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, James Lindsay seeks a reversal of the district court order denying his motion for postconviction relief.

We affirm the district court for Douglas County’s order in all respects.

FACTS

At about 8 a.m. on June 7, 1991, Omaha police executed a search warrant at an Omaha residence where the appellant Lindsay and a woman named “Ronette Johnson” were found sleeping in the master bedroom.

The evidence seized by police during the search included (1) a rock of crack…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lange Industries, Inc. v. Hallam Grain Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. NielsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. BowenNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. LunaNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. BurlisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. RyanNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. HessNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API