Legal Opinion

State v. Ali

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 12, 2011No. A10-1737PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

Two questions are presented in this appeal: (1) whether the denial of a defendant’s motion to dismiss an indictment for murder for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is immediately appealable as of right; and (2) the appropriate evidentiary standard to be applied to the question of a defendant’s age on the date of the alleged offense. We conclude that the denial of a defendant’s motion to dismiss an indictment for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is immediately appealable as of right. We further conclude that the State bears the burden of proving the defendant’s age…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan AliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. County of Washington v. City of Oak Park HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. State v. ArotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Beuning Family LP v. County of StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. People ex rel. J.G.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API