State v. Arot
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] The State of North Dakota appealed from a district court order dismissing charges against Korsiba Arot for lack of jurisdiction. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Arot was charged in district court with three counts of gross sexual imposition for incidents that occurred in the summer of 2011, the latest of which occurred on August 24, 2011. Arot moved to dismiss the criminal charges arguing the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case because Arot was not eighteen at the time of the incidents. Attached to the motion was an affidavit from Arot’s father. The affidavit stated…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hammeren v. HammerenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Hammeren v. HammerenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Wigginton v. WiggintonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- United States v. Salgado-OcampoDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- State v. AliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- COOPER EX REL. COOPER v. WadeMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Fredericks v. FredericksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. G.C.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- City of Grand Forks v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. FrancisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.