Legal Opinion

Williams v. Pacific Surety Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. In Banc. Statement by Mr. Justice Ramsey. This is an action by F. F. Williams against the Pacific Surety Company and others. From a final order and judgment refusing to set aside a judgment in favor of plaintiff and defendant A. H. Ford, against defendant Pacific Surety Company and another, and denying leave to file an answer, the Pacific Surety Company appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ramsey

On August 1, 1910, the Oregon-Idaho Company, an Oregon corporation, entered into a contract with F. F. Williams and A. H. Ford whereby said company undertook to deliver to Ford and Williams, in a pond at a certain mill at Glendale, Oregon, 200,000,000 feet of logs at the rate of not less than 10,000,000 feet during the first year from the date of said contract, and from 15,000,000 to 25,000,000 feet, at the option of said Ford and Williams, or their successors and assigns, during each and every year thereafter, until the 200,000,000 feet of logs should be delivered. Ford and Williams agreed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. Pacific Surety Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Home Mutual Insurance v. O. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Fireman's Ins. v. Oregon RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State Insurance v. O. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Donart v. StewartOregon Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Washington Fidelity National InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Spitzer v. RolphOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. In Re Mannix EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Waters v. BIGELOWOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Seaweard v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API