Legal Opinion

Donart v. Stewart

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Klamath: Henry L. Benson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

This is a motion to recall a mandate. An action of forcible entry and detainer was instituted by the defendants herein to recover the possession of a building. The defendants in that action upon filing their answer therein also as plaintiffs filed a complaint herein in equity in the nature of a cross-bill, whereupon the proceedings at law were immediately stayed, and the cause was thereafter treated as a suit in equity. Issue was joined on the cross-bill, and, a trial being had, the suit was dismissed, but the final decree made no provision respecting any proceedings in the law action. From…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kountze v. Omaha Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Wilson v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Portland v. Bituminous Paving Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Bunneman & Martononi v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Zeuske v. ZeuskeOregon Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gellert v. Bank of California, National Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Tot v. GongOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Hirsch v. MayOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Tooze v. HeightonOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Williams v. Pacific Surety Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API