Legal Opinion

Polygenex International, Inc. v. Polyzen, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 18, 1999No. 98-908PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Chief Judge.

We first note that on 28 January 1999, McGarry petitioned this Court for writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 21 of the N.C. R. App. Proc. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted.

We next consider whether the trial court committed reversible error by sanctioning McGarry pursuant to Rule 11. McGarry first argues that the order should be vacated as to him on the grounds that he was deprived of his federal and state constitutional due process rights. Additionally, McGarry argues that “[u]nder the plain and unambiguous language of Rule 11, sanctions apply only to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Turner v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Bryson v. SullivanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. MacK v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Morris v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. McDonald's Corp. v. DwyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Burgess v. BusbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Richardson v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Eli Research, Inc. v. United Communications Group, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
  4. Static Control Components, Inc. v. VoglerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Laws v. Priority Trustee Services of N.C., L.L.C.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API