Legal Opinion
Beal v. Beal
California Supreme Court
Decided September 2, 1933No. Docket No. S.F. 14841PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
Appeal from order of the San Mateo County Superior Court, modifying provisions of final decree of divorce, relating to custody of children and allowance for their support and education.
On January 23, 1928, these parties executed a written property settlement agreement whereby, after specifying the terms of property division, it was agreed that the wife should have the custody of the two minor sons of the marriage, Carlton Beal, then about thirteen years of age, and Thomas Evans Beal, then about ten years of age, the husband reserving the right to visit them at all reasonable times. It was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- In Re Estates of ShannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Van Der Vliet v. Van Der VlietCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stever v. SteverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Frizzell v. FrizzellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Streeter v. StreeterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Adams v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.