Royal Indemnity Co. v. Olmstead
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
At all times pertinent here one Jordan was engaged in the car rental 'business in the city of Pasadena, California. By ordinance, duly enacted, the city of Pasadena required all those engaged in the car rental business within its boundaries to carry liability insurance. In compliance with the requirements of said ordinance Jordan secured a policy of insurance from appellant. This policy insured against loss the car owner and the person to whom a rental was made. Jordan rented a car to one Richard son who, while driving the rented car, struck and injured appellee Olmstead.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. AlbrittonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Kruger v. California Highway Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Ott v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Butler v. AshworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Philip Joseph Twohy, Jr. v. The First National Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Lamoreux v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Billington v. Interinsurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- National Indemnity Co. v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Bridgeford v. U-Haul Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1976
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.