Legal Opinion

Eveland v. Detroit Machine Tool Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 14, 1927No. 6549PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, District Judge.

This is a motion by the plaintiff for leave to amend his declaration. The original declaration was filed June 28,1921, to recover damages alleged to have been caused to the plaintiff by the infringement by defendant of two certain patents owned by the plaintiff. The sixth para-, graph of said declaration was as follows:

“That the said letters patent were issued to your plaintiff and inventor for a period of seventeen (17) years, which period did expire December 21, 1920, but were in full force and effect up to and including that day, and that the said letters patent did…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Texas Portland Cement Co. v. McCordSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. American Bonding & Trust Co. v. Gibson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  3. Herman v. Detroit Shipbuilding Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1924
  4. County of Mono v. FlaniganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Emerson v. HubbardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bailey v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Chapman v. Griffith-Consumers Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  3. Bowles v. SenderowitzDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Atlanta Metallic Casket Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  5. Dewey v. ClarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API