Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Senderowitz

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1946No. Civil Action 3835PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

This action was brought by the Administrator of the Office of Price Administration, pursuant to Section 205(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 1 to restrain defendants from selling certain merchandise until required records are prepared and maintained, to enjoin sales at over ceiling prices, and to recover treble damages for the sale, between July 1943 and April 1944, of men’s and boys’ shorts at prices allegedly in excess of the maximum prices determined under the Regulations.

In the complaint plaintiff alleges sales in excess of maximum prices determined by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. General American Tank Car Corp. v. El Dorado Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. United States Ex Rel. Texas Portland Cement Co. v. McCordSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. City of Texarkana v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Berssenbrugge v. Luce Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bonner v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. La Salle National Bank, Not Personally but as Trustee, Under Trust No. 17365 and Aaron B. Weiner v. 222 East Chestnut Street CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  3. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Plymouth Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
  4. Alabama v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2005
  5. City of Columbus Ex Rel. Willits v. CremeanOhio Court of Appeals · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API