Herman v. Detroit Shipbuilding Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, District Judge.
This is a motion to dismiss the bill of complaint herein (which alleges infringement of a patent of the plaintiffs and seeks the usual injunction and accounting) on the ground that the plaintiffs have assigned all of their right, title, and interest in said patent, and are not now the owners thereof, but that the assignee, the present owner, is a necessary party to this suit.
It is undisputed that the assignment in question was not made until after the commencement of this suit, and that in making such assignment the plaintiffs expressly reserved to themselves the right…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Moore v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Kaolatype Engraving Co. v. HokeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1887
- Dean v. MasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Canda Bros. v. Michigan Malleable Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kriger v. MacFadden Publications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Eveland v. Detroit Machine Tool Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1927
- John L. Rie, Inc. v. Shelly Bros., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Doak v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- Farbwerke vormals Meister Lucius & Bruning v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.