County of Mono v. Flanigan
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Mono County denying a new trial. W. H. Virden, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff brought its action against defendant to recover the sum of five hundred and fifty-one dollars, the amount of a license tax which it averred was due to it from defendant under the terms of an ordinance of the county exacting a license from all persons engaged in the business of “raising, grazing, and pasturing sheep" within the county. The cause was tried before a jury, which rendered its verdict for defendant. Judgment for defendant was entered in accordance with the verdict and from the order of the court refusing its motion for a new trial the county appeals. The complaint charged…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Quinebaug Bank v. LeavensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
- Georgia Railroad v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
- West v. ConantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Country of Plumas v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- In Re McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- People v. ChutnacutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Evers v. City of MayfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
- Scott v. McPheetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.