Legal Opinion
Winkler v. Magnuson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 21, 1995No. C3-95-854PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Appellant Randy C. Winkler challenges summary judgment dismissing his sexual abuse claim against respondents Albert C. Magnuson and Redeemer Covenant Church (the Church) as barred by the “delayed discovery” statute of limitations for such claims, Minn.Stat. § 541.078, subd. 2(a) (1992). The Church separately argues that summary judgment was proper as against Winkler’s theories of respondeat superior and negligence (the only bases of liability alleged as to the Church). We reverse on the “delayed discovery” statute of limitations issue, but affirm summary judgment as to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Myers Through Myers v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- M.L. v. MagnusonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Oelschlager v. MagnusonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Summers v. R & D AGENCY, INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, and the Class of Beneficiaries, Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 573.02 v. The City of Stillwater, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Stansell v. City of NorthfieldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Holiday Recreational Industries, Inc. v. Manheim Services Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.