Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. R. J. Edwards, Inc. v. Keith
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 6, 1937No. 26989PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
The plaintiff in error, referred to herein as relator, commenced this 'action in the district court of Osage county for a writ of mandamus directing defendant in error, referred to herein as respondent, to pay the interest coupons on certain waterworks bonds of the city of Pawhuska belonging to relator. From a judgment denying the peremptory writ the relator has appealed.
Tlie bonds in question were issued by the city of Pawhuska in full compliance with the provisions of section 27, art. 10, of the Constilution. They were dated June 19, 1919r, and matured June 19, 1939, with interest payable,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Edwards v. MillarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 2 of CushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Zachary v. City of WagonerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Eaton v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Williams v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Catholic Order of Foresters v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- Application of City Council of City of TahlequahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Palmer v. Town of SkiatookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- State Ex Rel. City of Pauls Valley v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co. v. Bryan County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.