Legal Opinion

Lorenzi v. PFIZER INC.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided October 24, 2007No. 4:06 CV 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

(Resolving Doc. Nos. 21, 35, 36)

DAVID D. DOWD, JR., District Judge.

Before the Court is the motion for summary judgment of defendant, Pfizer Inc. (“Pfizer”) (Doc. No. 21, as supplemented by Doc. No. 28), plaintiffs memorandum in opposition (Doc. No. 30), and Pfizer’s reply (Doc. No. 33). 1 For the reasons discussed below, the motion is granted.

I. BACKGROUND

On July 12, 2006, plaintiff Jamie Lorenzi filed an action against Pfizer in Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas. Pfizer properly removed the action to this Court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction.

The Complaint…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Donald G. Wexler v. White's Fine Furniture, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Deutsch Ex Rel. Estate of Deutsch v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  2. Davids v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  3. Colville v. Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2008
  4. In Re Aredia & Zometa Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API