Legal Opinion

Peters v. Peters Auto Sales, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1967PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The issue is simply whether the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. In deciding this question the pleading is entitled to a liberal construction and to all the reasonable inferences which can be drawn from the facts pleaded. Sec. 263.27, Stats.; Libowitz v. Lake Nursing Home, Inc. (1967), 35 Wis. 2d 74, 150 N. W. 2d 439, 151 N. W. 2d 680; Gregory III v. Madison Mobile Homes Park (1964), 24 Wis. 2d 275, 128 N. W. 2d 462; Christenson & Arndt, Inc., v. Wisconsin Telephone Co. (1953), 264 Wis. 238, 58 N. W. 2d 682. The briefs contain facts not alleged in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Electric Appliance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Winnebago Homes, Inc. v. SheldonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Goetz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Libowitz v. Lake Nursing Home, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Machesky v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Onderdonk v. LambWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Lorenz v. DreskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Prestin v. BaumgartnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Hoffmann v. Wausau Concrete Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Ampex Corp. v. Sound Institute, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API