Prestin v. Baumgartner
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
The sole issue on this appeal is as follows: Was the defendant’s answer sufficient either to negate the essential allegations of the plaintiff’s complaint or to raise an affirmative defense thereto ?
The plaintiff’s contention here, as in the trial court, is that the defendant’s answer was comprised of negative pregnants and was insufficient to place the allegations of the complaint in issue. 2
Negative pregnants occur in responsive pleadings where, as in the instant answer, the denials are stated in the very words employed in the complaint. Such denials were condemned by this court as early as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Carpenter v. Town of RollingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Garbutt v. Bank of Prairie du ChienWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
- Grimm v. Town of WashburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Johann v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Peters v. Peters Auto Sales, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Board of Regents of University of Wisconsin System v. MussallemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Jax v. JaxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Jennaro v. JennaroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Lichter v. FritschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Prior v. RathjenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.