Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Application of Hubert J. Tierney and Bertrand Y. Auger

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 7, 1968No. Patent Appeal 7874Published

1ConcurrenceSmith, Judge

I agree with the decision of the majority on the issue of “nonobviousness” over the prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 103. However, I believe that before this issue can properly be decided, it is necessary to dispose of the rejection of appellants’ claims on the ground of res judicata. My opinion is that this rejection should have been reversed. In re Hellbaum, 371 F.2d 1022, 54 CCPA 1051 (1967).

The application here on appeal is denominated by the appellants as a “continuation” of Serial No. 767,583 filed October 16, 1958, in which an appeal to the Board of Appeals resulted in a decision adverse to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Application of Milton E. HerrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  2. Application of Michael Mojzesz SzwarcCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  3. Application of Josef FriedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  4. Application of PruttonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  5. Application of Hans T. F. Lundberg and Theodore Zuschlag, Deceased, by Johanna Zuschlag, AdministratrixCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API