Legal Opinion

Application of Michael Mojzesz Szwarc

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided September 27, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6462, 7000PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge... . Appellant.,bus appealed the .rejection of' 3.product and ,8 process claims in his application 1 fqr patent, on certain polymers- and processes,for the production thereof. The rejection is based on appellant’s,British Patent which issued more than one-year prior to the filing date of the appealed application., 35 U.S.C. .§ 102(b).. The primary-issue infhisqa.se arises .under 35 U.S.C. §, 120 and requires a determination of whether, the present application is entitled tp the benefit of the fil*279ing date of an earlier D-S- application2 fop patent -filed,bj^pppellant, thq filing…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Freuler v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Application of David Neville Kirk and Vladimir PetrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  3. Application of George H. Hitchings, Gertrude B. Elion and Irving GoodmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  4. Application of Milton E. HerrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  5. Amgen, Inc., and Ortho Biotech, Inc., Omj Pharmaceutical, Inc. And Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Genetics Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API