Conlin v. Scio Township
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
In this zoning case, plaintiffs appeal as of right from the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition. We affirm.
This action arises from plaintiffs’ desire to develop a 136-acre tract of land in defendant township for residential purposes. The land is zoned A-l, General Agricultural. Section 4.02 of the township’s zoning ordinance allows single-family dwellings as a permitted use in the A-l district, subject to certain density restrictions prescribed in § 4.02.B.1, which, according to plaintiffs, would allow one home for each 7.5 acres. Alternatively, § 5.30.B of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Badiee v. Brighton Area SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Taylor v. CurrieMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Detroit Leasing Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Houdek v. Centerville TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Conlin v. SCIO TP.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.