Detroit Leasing Co. v. City of Detroit

Plaintiff appeals as of right an order denying its motion for summary disposition and granting summary disposition in favor of defendant in this quiet title action. We affirm.

Flaintiff argues that the trial court erred by denying its motion for summary disposition based on plaintiffs failure to comply with MCL 211.79a, and erred further by granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition on the basis of the court’s holding that the property was not “abandoned.” We disagree.

The trial court based its ruling on MCR 2.116(C)(10). We review de novo the trial court’s decision regarding summary…