Legal Opinion

Houdek v. Centerville Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 2007No. Docket 273469PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs, James and Madeline Houdek and Houdek’s Pumping Service, appeal as of right the trial court’s grant of summary disposition in favor of defendant, Centerville Township, in this action challenging a zoning ordinance. Because Centerville Township’s zoning ordinance regulating septage disposal and storage does not violate MCL 125.297a, is not exclusionary regarding both the land application of septage and the siting of septage storage structures, and is not unconstitutional on due process or equal protection grounds, we affirm.

i

Plaintiffs own and operate Houdek’s Pumping Service in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. West v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Gladych v. New Family Homes, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Amerisure Insurance v. PlumbMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Risko v. Grand Haven Charter Township Zoning Board of AppealsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Kenefick v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Dutton Partners, LLC v. CMS Energy Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Kenefick v. Battle CreekMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API