Legal Opinion
Naundorf v. Schumann
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided February 15, 1886PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Bill for construction of will and directions as to distribution of estate.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
Adam Rienaker, late of Newark, deceased, died January 12th, 1871. By his will, dated July 26th, 1854, he provided as follows:
“First. My will and desire is that all my property, both real and personal, shall be for the sole use and benefit of my wife Julianna, after my decease; and in the event of her death, then, what shall remain, to be disposed of in the manner following, viz., the whole to be disposed of as shall to my executor or executors seem best, and the profits or proceeds thereof to be equally divided between Maria Schumann, Margaretta Schumann, John Schumann, Eurieh…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hackensack Brick Co. v. Mayor of BogotaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gaston v. FordNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. HarloffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Sadler v. BergstromNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Briggs v. FaulknerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- Sampson v. SampsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.