Osborne v. Hurst
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Two property owners sued a neighbor for setting a fire that burned down the trees on their property. The trial concluded in a jury verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant. Both sides appeal various decisions of the trial court concerning summary judgment, admission of testimony, and attorney’s fees. We reverse and remand.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
In 1985 Ester Osborne and Harriet Christensen purchased, for $40,000, a 3.62 acre plot of land with a cabin on it. The plot, on a point near Homer, overlooked Kachemak Bay. About twenty percent of the land…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Roman Catholic Church v. Louisiana Gas Service Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Andersen v. EdwardsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Lewis v. LewisAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Crawford v. RogersAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
- Newton v. MagillAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Sengupta v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Broughton Lumber Co. v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
- Monzingo v. Alaska Air Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Barton v. North Slope Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Lampi v. SpeedMontana Supreme Court · 2011
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.