Legal Opinion
State v. Eastabrook
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 14, 1990No. 12213-8-IIPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPetrich, J.
— Garry Eastabrook challenges his conviction on counts of first degree burglary, first degree rape, and second degree burglary. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for severance of offenses and his motion for recusal. He also claims error based on the deputy prosecuting attorney's closing argument. We affirm.
Eastabrook was charged with first degree burglary (RCW 9A.52.020), first degree rape (RCW 9A.44.040), second degree burglary (RCW 9A.52.030), and first degree attempted rape (RCW 9A.28.020). In Eastabrook's first trial, he was acquitted of the first degree…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- State v. DunawayWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. TharpWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Allingham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. DominguezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- State v. BilalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- State v. CottenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- State v. RothCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- State v. HerzogCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.