State v. Dominguez
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.
Gary Dominguez appeals his convictions of residential burglary and third degree theft. His only contention on appeal is that he is entitled to a new trial because the judge’s failure to disqualify himself violated the appearance of fairness doctrine. In previous criminal trials, the judge had once represented Mr. Dominguez as defense counsel and Mr. Dominguez claimed he had filed a complaint against the judge regarding that representation, and the judge had once prosecuted Mr. Dominguez. We affirm.
On January 3,1993, Louise Schuh returned to her home near Moses Lake and discovered someone had…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- State v. PostWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. DarushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- State v. MadryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- State v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Smith v. Behr Process Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Smith v. Behr Process Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. GambleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. GambleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ChamberlinWashington Supreme Court · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.