Legal Opinion
State v. Bilal
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 3, 1995No. 15261-4-IIPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Houghton, A.C.J.
Abdullah Faruq Bilal appeals from a conviction of rape in the second degree, contending the trial court erred in certain evidentiary rulings and in failing to recuse itself at the sentencing hearing. He also appeals on grounds of cumulative error, ineffective assistance of counsel and insufficiency of the evidence. We affirm.
On March 25, 1991, RW called the emergency 911 dispatcher to report she had been raped by Bilal. Officers responded to the call and later that day, Bilal was arrested and taken into custody. Bilal was charged by information with rape in the second degree.
A…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. PostWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- United States v. Harry Greenspan, AKA Alfred A. Lugo, AKA Alfred Anthony Lugo, AKA Alex Lugo, AKA Alex StoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- James Edward Wilks v. Thomas Israel, Warden, Wisconsin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. GambleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. GambleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. DominguezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Tatham v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- In re the Marriage of MeredithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.