Legal Opinion
United States v. Wright
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 12, 2011No. 10-1249, 10-1956PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
Augustus Wright and Raymie Henderson were convicted by separate juries of conspiring to engage in monetary transactions in criminally derived property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956. Henderson was additionally convicted of engaging in a monetary transaction in criminally derived property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957. On appeal, Wright and Henderson ask us reverse their convictions and/or remand their cases for new trials on several grounds: (1) the judge erred in denying a motion to dismiss because the indictment was too late to satisfy the statute of limitations;…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Richard O'HaraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Michael A. YasharCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Anwar HaddadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. VillasenorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. AmbroseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Dennis D. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. SalemCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.