Legal Opinion

United States v. Anwar Haddad

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 14, 2006No. 05-3086PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

A jury found Anwar Haddad was guilty of one count of wire fraud and two counts of money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 and 18 U.S.C. § 1957. Haddad’s store, R & F Grocery (“R & F”), was authorized to sell certain approved food items for food stamps. The evidence showed that he defrauded the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) by exchanging food stamps for cash, keeping a cut of the transactions for himself.

Haddad was sentenced to concurrent terms of 51 months’ imprisonment on all three counts and two years of supervised release. The district…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. Mandell Jackson, Joseph Davis, and Romano GinesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Mardisco Staples and Delwin BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. United States v. AbbasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. BrodieCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Leslie MayfieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Abidemi AjayiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Hayfa Khther Al-Shahin and Riyadh L. Al-ShahinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API