Legal Opinion
United States v. Salem
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 9, 2011No. 10-3682, 10-3715PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TINDER, Circuit Judge.
Aida Salem and Bogdan Ganescu come before us again in these successive appeals. Salem pled guilty to one count of wire fraud, see 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and Ganescu pled guilty to several counts of wire fraud and two counts of receipt of stolen funds, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 2315, arising out of their participation in an internet fraud scheme. In their first appeal, we held that the district court erred in not making certain findings regarding the jointly undertaken criminal activity under U.S.S.G. § lB1.3(a)(l)(B) and we remanded. See United States v. Salem, 597 F.3d 877 (7th…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Brian StudleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. AslanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Soto-PiedraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. SalemCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Cruz-ReaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Michael ShenemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Ramone MockabeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. David DonadeoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Jose MelendezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Michael DickersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.