State v. Woodrome
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge.
This is a case addressing the reasonableness — or unreasonableness as it were — of one’s expectation of privacy in stolen property. Clinton Woodrome (“Woodrome”) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Bates County, Missouri (“trial court”), convicting him, after a jury trial, of three counts of receiving stolen property, § 570.080. On appeal, Woodrome claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence and then admitting evidence obtained in what Woo-drome argues was an unlawful search conducted without a search warrant and absent exigent…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State of Missouri v. Dana M. HindmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. GanzorigMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. TENA D. CADYMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Shumate v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.