Legal Opinion

State v. Woodrome

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 10, 2013No. WD 75460PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge.

This is a case addressing the reasonableness — or unreasonableness as it were — of one’s expectation of privacy in stolen property. Clinton Woodrome (“Woodrome”) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Bates County, Missouri (“trial court”), convicting him, after a jury trial, of three counts of receiving stolen property, § 570.080. On appeal, Woodrome claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence and then admitting evidence obtained in what Woo-drome argues was an unlawful search conducted without a search warrant and absent exigent…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. State of Missouri v. Dana M. HindmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. GanzorigMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. TENA D. CADYMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Shumate v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API