Legal Opinion
STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. TENA D. CADY
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 2, 2014No. SD32636PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGary W. Lynch, J.
Tena D. Cady (“Defendant”) appeals her conviction on two counts of attempt to manufacture a controlled substance, see section 195.211. 1 Defendant raises three points on appeal: first, that the trial court erred in overruling her motion to suppress and her continuing objection to the admission of evidence found during the search of her shop building because the shop building was located within the curtilage of her property, rendering the initial “knock and talk” improper, and because any subsequent consent to search was involuntary; second, that the trial court erred in admitting NPLEx…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State of Missouri v. Terrill E. ReynoldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. NebbittMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ANGELA MEGAN GUINNMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Timothy A. PierceMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ANGELA MEGAN GUINNMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.