Newport v. Crane Service, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice:
The dispositive issue is whether the trial court erred when it ruled that plaintiff’s exclusive remedy for his personal injury is by a claim in the Workers’ Compensation Court. We answer in the affirmative.
Raymond Newport [worker] was employed as an electrician for Oklahoma Steel Mill [Mill], When the worker was unable to repair a large electric motor, the Mill con tracted with Wilson Electric Motor Service, Inc. [Wilson] for such service. Wilson hired Crane Service, Inc. [Crane] to remove the motor from the Mill and transport it to Wilson’s shop for repairs. While in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Murphy v. Chickasha Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- W. P. Atkinson Enterprises, Inc. v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Ishmael v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Dolese Bros. v. TollettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- O'BAUGH v. Drilling Well Control, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
3Cited by13 opinions
- Weber v. Armco, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Murray County v. Homesales, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- STRICKLAND v. STEPHENS PRODUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Noyce v. Ratliff Drilling Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
- Stacy v. Bill Hodges Truck Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.